Real Freedom vs Fake Freedom
REAL FREEDOM and the NEW WORLD ORDER
There exists two Freedoms. Real freedom and Fake freedom. Real freedom corresponds to responsibility, taking responsibility, being responsible, and acting responsibly.
From this Real freedom stems autonomy, self-governance, determination, and conscious decision making in accord with causing no harm. Being responsible entails being responsible for the propagation of the best interest of oneself as well as the defense of oneself from harm; making choices that are not antithetical toward the self and having the capability to discern the difference between truth and falsehood and be capable to deal with falsehoods being propagated as reality in a stress-free manner – this involves self-mastery and discipline as well as courage. Not only does this benefit the self but it overtly benefits those in society because confidence radiates encouragement in a system based on original truth.
While on the other hand, is the Fake freedom which is the prevalent “freedom” touted in America today. Two hundred plus years ago, the inhabitants of what is today called TheCanada, a great lot of them, knew real freedom and the example I draw from is
“The Articles of Confederation”, the Declaration of Independence, the orations of Patrick Henry, and the writings of Thomas Paine from his pamphlet entitled “Common Sense”. These are Men, and many others from that generation, who were staunch individualists in tune with both physical and non-physical reality, mind and matter.
FAKE FREEDOM and the OLD WORLD ORDER
Fake freedom is the freedom to consume anything, regardless of how unhealthy it is for the person, or how much grief it causes to the conscious thoughts of the person consuming that garbage.
Fake freedom is the “freedom” to be lazy; to do the least amount of thinking possible and rely on so called “experts” to figure all things out. Fake freedom is the “freedom” to be an unfulfilled human who prefers to sit back and watch others live.
He spends endless hours in undiscriminating television viewing. Fake freedom is using violence and coercion to propagate something called "freedom".
I have news for the advocates of this false freedom notion. It's called look at the damage you have done to the spirit of your fellow men and women.
Are you "happy" yet? Or should I ask if you are fake happy or real happy and do you discern the difference?
Real freedom is having the free-will ability to choose something without fear.
Fake freedom is being coerced into pre-designated options under duress. Real freedom is being truly educated; given the tools to learn how to learn for oneself, on ones own, confidently while fake assed freedom is being told what is true and going along with it; being told a declarative sentence and accepting it without question.
My issue with fake assed freedom is that it is not truth and leads to destruction. It is a master deception.
A lie. The lie is that if you surrender, or sacrifice, some of your liberty, someone else will take on your responsibility to decide what is best for you and society as a group. An obvious example of this is legislators. At all times, legislators will to remove “individual” freedom for the best interest of “the group”. In the process, individuals ALWAYS suffer by way of coercion, threats of violence, and duress.
Though, it “sounds” like a noble thing to do, sacrifice a little liberty so that “the group” may prosper, it is an unsound idea simply because “the group” does not exist.
The group ONLY exists within the mind as a construct. And, within this construct of “the group” exists what IS actually true, real, and existent… the individual. There is no group. You may belong to a group of people who work on the same project, but there is no “group benefit”, each is paid according to their “individual” talent and ambition. What “the group” seeks to do is CONFORM all minds into one standardized musical note humming the same tune. This is called collectivism and it is conformity to a low standard.
Collectivism is the age old idea that “some” are meant to rule while others are meant to be ruled. Leonard Piekoff illustrated this point beautifully in his book The Objectivist, “The philosophy of collectivism upholds the existence of a mystic (and unperceivable) social organism, while denying the reality of perceived individuals—a view which implies that man’s senses are not a valid instrument for perceiving reality.
Collectivism maintains that an elite endowed with special mystic insight should rule men—which implies the existence of an elite source of knowledge, a fund of revelations inaccessible to logic and transcending the mind.
Collectivism denies that men should deal with one another by voluntary means, settling their disputes by a process of rational persuasion; it declares that men should live under the reign of physical force (as wielded by the dictator of the omnipotent state)—a position which jettisons reason as the guide and arbiter of human relationships.
From every aspect, the theory of collectivism points to the same conclusion: collectivism and the advocacy of reason are philosophically antithetical; it is one or the other.”
I would only disagree with his calling collectivism a philosophy because collectivism is actually the absence of philosophy, the destruction of sound reason, which in turn flows toward foolishness, not wisdom.
And yes, that IS a declarative statement… but it’s true. And at this point I would en-courage you to please involve yourself in the study of that truth and come to your own understanding and promote that understanding far and wide to assist others in the inquiry necessary in gaining accuracy of navigation throughout our shared reality.
“NEW” “WORLD” “ORDER”
This idea of a “new world order” of globalism is a two-fold extremity.
The word “new” implies that it is something that has not occurred in the past, a revolutionary idea that will change the paradigm or status quo, and something that has not yet been tested in physical reality.
But on the contrary, what we refer to as new world order is a sugar-coated delusion to insist that something is “new” when it has only been re-packaged, re-formulated, re-animated from “old” ideas that HAVE existed and do still persist.
The collectivism of the group is merely the Feudalism of history.
Feudalism has been re-engineered, re-designed, and re-packaged toward an audience of “consumers”/ "employees"/ "human resources" who do not possess the adequate context of history (the route in which we've arrived to the point in time in which we are now present – the present moment) – And how are we to navigate forward, into the future, with accuracy, and arrive at a suitable destination, if we do not have an accurate understanding of the map from whence we began sail?
To know where we are heading, as a “collective group”, on the sea of life, we must have a map of the terrain. Point A is the past, Point B is the present, and point C is the destination. If we are presently experiencing tumultuous storms, hurricanes, and whirlwinds we must know how we have arrived at this point. Because, it is obvious that the captain of the ship (you) were not paying attention. You were hoodwinked and your attention was placed elsewhere through careful manipulation.
The globalists are correct in their rhetoric depicting the necessity of a "new world order" to usher in an age of peace.
Everyone wants peace unless you're a psychopathic, selfish, little ego driven narcissist, the want is in alignment with empathy and compassion. But the context in which the idea of the new world order will become manifested is the point that must be distinguished between.
The global elitists have an undying thirst for wealth and power, and through the illusion of prestige, the end shall justify the means in achieving their life long aspirations.
Therefore the context in which this supposed "age of peace" is broadcast-ed in is a positive one. However, under careful examination of the motives and deeds they use to catapult the world into this so called "new order", we find Orwellian double-think to be one of the most absolute truths ever to be understood.
REAL NEW WORLD ORDER VS. FAKE NEW WORLD ORDER
It is critical to understand that the “new” world order was the founding of the United States of America. Never before in history was “individual” liberty fought for and actually established. With individual liberty stems the gracious fellowship with nature that enables mankind to expand consciousness toward greater and greater heights of possibility. The founders and framers of this “new” revolutionary idea drew from nature the common sense of it's principles and applied it toward mankind. The government, for the people and BY THE PEOPLE recognized the principle in nature that each individual is sovereign and RESPONSIBLE for their dominion. And with this responsibility there is only two roads to go down – down the road of truth or down the road of error. To preserve Life, liberty, and property or to degrade life, make liberty conditional, and tax privately owned property.
At this point, it is important to recognize that when this nation was founded there were still being perpetuated ideologies, structures, and frames of thinking that led to error. All the governments of history and existing governments, at that time, were ALL based on fallacious, erroneous models – meaning they were not consistent with nature and her rules. The people themselves, which consisted of this “new world” had to adjust to becoming free. So, we can contend that the people, at the dawn of this new revolutionary idea were now making a transition from one state into the other. From being ruled into being masters – determining their own individual course. It was the ultimate Hegelian dialectic where the thinking habits of the people were not squarely in alignment with self-government, in fact a great majority actually insisted upon George Washington being their new King. This intermingling of falsehood and truth has, over the past 250 years resulted in falsehood clearly being the victor of the two because as it is said, you must pluck the weeds otherwise they will take for themselves all of the nourishment from the flowers and overcome them completely. Well, that is firmly the case.
WHY WE ARE EQUAL
All Men are created equal – meaning we are all equally responsible for our thoughts and deeds. The laws of the Universe are equally distributed among ALL men and we will all equally atone for our mistakes. This is evident upon our creations. We create something, like government, we breathe life into it, and magically believe that the consequences of the actions government takes will be distributed solely upon government. ERR WRONG. Any individual, giving away their consent to be governed by it's creation (government) will be subjected to the misery of it's erroneous fruits. The same is true for sculptors who create statues of Gods who the people idolize as God himself; the sculptor reaps what he sows by way of those around him consenting to error. If you think we escape the effects, you are wrong. Yes, we created this tree and we called it government. That tree is producing fruit that the creators all partake and eat from and as a result of the law of cause and effect, the ill situation we call "freedom" is manifested in our life as decay. True freedom is not a creation of the mind of man, rather it is derived from nature NOT government. We all have this natural law of consequences governing our behaviors equally. This is an established, known, and understood principle of nature and is absolutely crucial/ vital to grasp and understand in order to comprehend the foundation upon which individual liberty, rights, and dominion spring.
NOTE: This article is re-posted from this group at Facebook - (not sure who the original author is): https://www.facebook.com/travelordrive