James Traficant - Americans Are Prisoners of the Fed

R.I.P. James Trafficant:

Former Ohio Rep. James Traficant Dies After Accident

American Patriot, Congressman James Traficant, died Saturday (September 27, 2014) at age 73. He represented Youngstown Ohio from 1985-2002 - re-elected eight times. He was framed for "corruption" in 2002, expelled from Congress and spent seven years in prison.

In a 1993 speech (below), he explained that Americans had lost their freedom because their personal property and wealth are pledged against the national debt. No doubt, this is the rationale behind the emergence of the US Police State. The international bankers are ensuring they can collect.  Terrorism is just a pretext. Just two months ago, Traficant began a grassroots campaign "Project Freedom USA" to put people pressure on Congress to get rid of the IRS and "divorce" the Federal Reserve.

"We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this unpayable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it."  James Trafficant in 1993

The Bankruptcy of the United States 

(Abridged by henrymakow.com) 

Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House of Representative March 17, 1993:

"Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner's report that will lead to our demise.

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only. 

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: "The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States.' ....

The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same.

Assets of the debtor can also be hypothecated (to pledge something as a security without taking possession of it.) as security by the lender or underwriter. The Federal Reserve Act stipulated that the interest on the debt was to be paid in gold. There was no stipulation in the Federal Reserve Act for ever paying the principle.

Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913.)

"Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.

In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another.

This has been going on for over eighty years without the "informed knowledge" of the American people, without a voice protesting loud enough. Now it's easy to grasp why America is fundamentally bankrupt.

Why don't more people own their properties outright?

Why are 90% of Americans mortgaged to the hilt and have little or no assets after all debts and liabilities have been paid? Why does it feel like you are working harder and harder and getting less and less?

We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this unpayable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it.

America has become completely bankrupt in world leadership, financial credit and its reputation for courage, vision and human rights. This is an undeclared economic war, bankruptcy, and economic slavery of the most corrupt order! Wake up America! Take back your Country."

-----

Youngstown native Scottie Spencer's Tribute to local hero

-----
First Comment from Dan:

Traficant was still at it this summer.  You can see he was strong as a bull and would have lived a century if he hadn't had an accident. Tractor accidents aren't rare, but the story has lot's of red flags that can't be checked out.  As his death is so very convenient I can only assume it was caused, though it's pointless to suggest it because they did such a good job of making it look like bad luck.

Jim Traficant Vs ADL Attack Of Pokerface Paul Topete Speech@Freedompalooza 3 (July 5, 2013)

Traficant was pretty well the last known voice we had speaking out on these issues, and he'd have never stopped.

In this video, you can hear his message was that the only way we get the country back is for all the groups to get together.

He means blacks, whites, rednecks, rich or poor. That's exactly what media and government has been working so hard to prevent from ever happening.

Part 2- Just found this talk by Trafficant from 2013.  He was leading an organized investigation of Bilderberg. He explained the way to penetrate the secrecy is to look for tax dollars being used to fund anything to do with the meetings. 

"You've got to go beyond [protests] and you have to secure evidence," he said, as onlookers at this year's protest site listened intently. "We're announcing that me, Jim Traficant, in conjunction with AMERICAN FREE PRESS, will be serving on the U.S. government only, a broad-based federal Freedom of Information Act inquiry into the activities of Bilderberg." He then centered on this key question: Is there any money budgeted in any federal government account, or has there been any expenditure of public funds, that have gone, in any way, in subsidizing Bilderberg?"

"Therefore, citizens of nearly any nation--given what happens to nations ensnared in Bilderberg's assault since 1954 on economic and political sovereignty--also should seek hard evidence of their tax dollars being used for Bilderberg, since the involvement of any public officials with Bilderberg could then more easily be questioned--and ideally brought to a halt."

Bilderberg 2013 Jim Traficant 'It's About Money' and http://americanfreepress.net/?p=11113

NOTE: This article is originally published at this website:

http://henrymakow.com/2014/09/Trafficant-Americans-are-prisoners-of-the-fed.html

Oswald Dismissed As Lone Gunman in JFK Killing

By Jerome R. Corsi

Forensic pathologist calls single-bullet theory 'pure nonsense'

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Forensic pathologist Cyril Wecht kicked off the second day of the Assassination Archive and Research Center, or AARC, conference on the John F. Kennedy slaying by insisting Lee Harvey Oswald could not have been the lone shooter.

“I think the single-bullet theory is pure nonsense,” Wecht told an all-star cast of JFK assassination “conspiracy theorists” at the conference commemorating the 50th anniversary of the publication of the Warren Commission Report.

Wecht proceeded to explain the gyrations and changes in direction required for one bullet to have hit JFK, passing up through JFK’s body from the entrance wound in the back, to exit through JFK’s neck (moving upward at an 11 degree angle), to enter Connelly’s back, break a rib, exit Connelly’s chest and break Connelly’s right wrist, only to end embedded in Connelly’s left thigh.

“The explanations are ridiculous,” Wecht challenged. “Was JFK bending over tying his shoe when he got shot? Not if you look at the Zapruder film. JFK was sitting upright, and the entrance wound in his back was lower than the supposed exit wound in this throat. How is it possible that a bullet fired from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository moved in an upward direction transiting through JFK’s body?”

Secret details of JFK’s assassination are unlocked in Jerome Corsi’s “Who Really Killed Kennedy?”

Wecht insisted the burden of proof rested with the prosecution.

“All the defense has to show is that Lee Harvey Oswald could not possibly have been the sole gunman, and that can be established by science,” he insisted. “We do not need to prove who did the shooting to prove the government is lying. I’ll let you assume Oswald was a shooter if you want. The point is that if Oswald was not the sole shooter, the Warren Commission Report is a cover-up and the government has been lying to us for 50 years.”

Wecht concluded by insisting the RFK shooting was also an assassination.

“Again the case is settled by forensic pathology,” he again insisted. “The shot that killed RFK was fired from the back at a distance of approximately 1.5 inches from his head, when it’s clear Sirhan Sirhan was standing in front of RFK at a distance greater than 1.5 inches during the shooting.”

Autopsy “junk science”

Dr. Gary Aguilar, an ophthalmologist by training, pointed out that neither James Hume, the senior pathologist and director of laboratories at Bethesda Hospital, nor Navy pathologist J. Thornton Boswell, who assisted Hume at the JFK autopsy, had ever conducted an autopsy of someone shot by a gunshot wound prior to undertaking the JFK assassination, perhaps the most historically important autopsy in U.S. history.

Aguilar went through a detailed analysis of the JFK autopsy evidence, pointing out that Hume allowed their forensic analysis to be strongly influenced by the hearsay testimony provided by government officials attending the autopsy that JFK was hit from behind and that his head was thrown violently forward as a result.

He demonstrated evidence subsequently developed from examination of the autopsy photographs and notes makes clear Hume and Boswell missed key facts that would have influenced their conclusions had they been known on the evening of Nov. 22, 1963, when the autopsy was conducted, including numerous bullet fragments found in the rear portion of the skull and measurements that show JFK’s back wound was not at the base of the neck but below the shoulder some two inches from the spine.
“The conclusions of the Bethesda autopsy are best classified as ‘junk science,’” Aguilar insisted, not the type of professional forensic pathology required in an autopsy trying to determine the cause of death of a U.S. president assassinated by gunfire.

Gunshots recorded

Acoustical expert Dr. Don Thomas presented evidence from his 2013 book “Hear No Evil: Politics, Science, and Forensic Evidence in the Kennedy Assassination,” that the National Academy of Sciences panel was severely flawed in dismissing a police dictabelt recording that provided proof of a fourth shot from the grassy knoll – evidence that persuaded the House Select Committee on Assassinations to conclude Oswald was not the lone gunman.

Thomas had presented his analysis initially in a peer-reviewed article in “Science and Justice,” a quarterly publication of Britain’s Forensic Science Society.

The sounds of the JFK assassination were recorded at Dallas police headquarters when a motorcycle policeman in the JFK motorcade accidently left his microphone switch “on,” recording the sounds from Dealey Plaza as JFK was being shot.

Thomas played for the conference the sounds recorded by the dictabelt on which the gunshots can be heard, recorded in real time, as JFK was being assassinated.

Thomas explained how “cross-talk” on two different police channels recorded during the assassination and “test shots” fired in Dealey Plaza at the time of the initial HCSA analysis provided evidence the shots discernable through the static of the recording confirms the initial HCSA conclusions: a fourth shot was fired from the grassy knoll during the assassination. (snip) ...

NOTE: Read the complete article at this website:
http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/oswald-dismissed-as-lone-gunman-in-jfk-killing

Leonard Cohen and MKULTRA - Military Mind Control at McGill and Columbia

 By Ann Diamond

The man in the photo, taken at McGill University in 1951, is 17-year-old Leonard Cohen. He's wearing a blindfold, and his ears, fingers and hands are encased in padded restraints which prevent movement and cut off all sensory stimulation. This is one of Dr. Donald Hebb's famous/notorious sensory isolation experiments, for which student volunteers were paid the then-princely sum of $20 a day. Some of the volunteers were unable to stand this torture for more than a few hours. Some tore off the bandages and banged on the door of the isolation chamber, screaming and crying to be released.

Back in the 1980s, when I lived next door to him, Leonard Cohen once told me he enjoyed these experiments. He said he learned to dissociate, leave his body, and go on long voyages through the universe. The experience was so pleasant that later he volunteered to be placed in a flotation tank while on LSD. He enjoyed that, too.

We now know that D.O. Hebb's sensory isolation experiments became the foundation for torture techniques used by the CIA etc. in its secret prisons around the planet. Hebb, a neurologist, had CIA clearance, and also allegedly experimented on small children, mainly orphans and aboriginal children who arrived in his laboratory courtesy of McGill and the RCMP. Having access to human guinea pigs made Hebb's research that much more impressive. He also, of course, worked with rats and monkeys. It seems quite likely that his famous "rat" study on the effects of sensory isolation on IQ, would have been based on his experiments with children. McGill, at the time, was controlled by a network that included many British-trained, mind-controlled pedophiles with an interest in eugenics – and probably still is today.

In 1951, when this photo was taken, Leonard Cohen was 17, i.e. still a minor. One wonders who signed the permission slip – his mother? Or perhaps they just didn't bother with those little details, back then.

Leonard Cohen went on to become a poet of note. In fact, that same year, 1951, he published his first book, Let Us Compare Mythologies. It would be interesting to do a textual analysis of all of Cohen's writing – someday when I have more time I plan to do that (: – combing his poetry and novels for references to the secret program that he has been part of for most of his life. Up to now, his biographers seem to have overlooked all the references to hospitals, (Nazi) doctors, psychiatric experiments, electroshock, etc. They also have failed to adequately explain the missing years (mid-1950s, i.e. peak years of the MKULTRA program) when Cohen did some sort of graduate work at Columbia University in New York.

McGill and Columbia happened to be co-epicentres of MKULTRA research into mind control. As were certain studios and film-making teams at the NFB, the arm of British intelligence that brought our Leonard to national attention in 1966, with the film Ladies and Gentlemen… Mr. Leonard Cohen. As was the Silva Mind Control organization, where Leonard met Suzanne in the late 1960s. As was Nashville, where his musical career took him later. 

And let's not forget the Chelsea Hotel, where he hobnobbed with musicians and CIA programmers like Kris Kristofferson, always mentioned whenever Cohen introduces his song "Chelsea Hotel" about the time he had sex with mind-controlled singer Janis Joplin. That night, Janis was apparently looking for Kristofferson, one of the "handsome men" she preferred, according to the song – one of the creepiest in Cohen's repertoire, in my opinion.

It's very obvious to anyone who happens to have followed Cohen's career, that the singer-songwriter who composed "I'm Your Man" has spent most of his life surfing the mind control circuit that took him from McGill to New York and then Europe where he connected with the Rothschilds.

Let's just say that early on, he "volunteered" – and the rest is musical history. This is a topic for a long article, but for now I'll keep it small and personal. Lately, I've been thinking back to times when I witnessed Leonard Cohen's programming either in operation, or failing to operate properly. That is, when I lived next door to him and one or more of his handlers. By the mid-'80s, many people had grouped around him who seemed to be there to smooth things over. He also once told me that he depended heavily on doctors and psychiatrists at the (notorious MKULTRA hospital) Allan Memorial Institute, a half hour walk from his house near Saint Lawrence Boulevard. In fact, during those years, he frequented the swimming pool behind the Allan, where doctors, nurses, and other hospital staffers hung out with people from the Entertainment scene – I was told by a former orderly that the purest cocaine from the hospital pharmacy could be bought beside the pool on just about any summer day.

It is one thing to meet and get to know Leonard Cohen. It would be hard to imagine or find a more charming, generous, affable, funny guy to have as a neighbour. Unfortunately, though, that's only one of many personae, or "alters" – Cohen has many. I wouldn't like to guess how many. I suspect there may be hundreds. What this means is, getting to know him is virtually impossible, because his various alters are not necessarily aware of one another. This explains why, while living next door, I witnessed events that sometimes made no sense, and would have been impossible if Cohen were a normal person, with a single core personality. 

Mind-controlled entertainers and public figures – and this also applies to certain mind-controlled politicians, like Pierre Trudeau, a friend of Cohen's – require handlers to help them manage situations caused by their having various alters that don't all work together. These handlers, e.g. Kris Kristofferson, who likely was Janis Joplin's programmer – are there to coordinate and conceal the fact that these public figures are "programmed multiples."

An incident comes to mind that occurred in about 1985, when I had been living next door to Cohen for two years. During that time, I had rarely seen him – I was busy, in those days, making a living by writing and editing. I also had a weekly program on local community radio, went out with friends most evenings. I had little to do with my neighbours who, in many ways, behaved like members of an exclusive club. The incident I'm thinking of happened out of the blue, one day. I got a phone call from Leonard, whom I hadn't seen in several months. He invited me next door for tea. Cautiously pleased with the invitation, which seemed to suggest we were back on a friendly footing, I rang his doorbell, he opened the door, and we drank tea in his kitchen. We chatted, he may have played me a new song or two, or showed me a drawing. Just like in the old days when we'd been friends.

Then he said he had an appointment somewhere and needed to take a bath. I offered to leave. He said: no, just sit here for a few minutes in case the phone rings. He got in the bath, I sat in the kitchen, and sure enough, the phone rings. It's Hazel, the woman next door. I tell her Leonard is in the bath, and to please call back in a few minutes, which she does. At this point, the story becomes a bit extraordinary. I am standing a few feet from the phone, and I can hear Hazel shouting. I can't make out what she's saying, but she is screaming what appears to be verbal abuse, and Leonard, who has his ear to the phone, becomes rigid and just listens. The screaming goes on for, maybe, half a minute during which he does not move, does not respond, or react. When the screaming stops, he says "OK" and hangs up. The phone rings again; he picks it up. More of the same shouting. Once again, he listens without affect, without moving, and says "OK." Then he hangs up, turns to me, and in a blank tone says "You'd better go now." Which I do.

But I'm upset with Hazel, so I phone her when I get home, and leave a one-line message on her answering machine suggesting that she stop doing whatever it was she was doing when she phoned him, shouting like a drill sergeant.

Later that night, there is a meeting in his front room. I happen to walk by, and unusually, the blinds are up and I see Leonard, encircled by the people I thought of as his "cult followers." He is speaking to them, gesturing dramatic. I only get a glimpse of this meeting as I pass the window, but my snapshot impression is that he is asking for their help in some difficult matter that is causing him great anxiety.

And sure enough, half an hour later, I get a phone call, from a woman called Birgit, whom I know quite well, but consider to be a fairly hardcore Cohen groupie. She has come from the meeting. She arrives as I'm cooking supper, sits in my kitchen, and goes straight to the point. I have to move from the neighbourhood, she says, and stop harassing Leonard Cohen. I'm, well, stunned. It's the first time anyone has spoken to me in two years about how I came to be living next door. The first time anyone has suggested it might be a problem. But I'm not stupid. I'm quite aware that my presence in the neighbourhood has caused concern for certain people. The fact, however, is that I am there as the result of a peculiar coincidence. That there is no way I could have found this apartment on my own – I'm there, and I can't really explain how it happens, in a city of 1 million people, I manage to move in next door to Leonard Cohen – it just happened. That's it, that's all.

I also knew, back then and today, that nobody in Cohen's circle believed this. And neither do I, to this day, really understand how things like that happen. But that day, he had invited me over, as if letting bygones be bygones, and it had appeared, for about an hour, that relations were back to normal – until Hazel called, that is, and shouted into the phone, and he went numb.

And who called the meeting? And what was it about? No explanation was ever given. Another cult member, Charlie, phoned me the next day and invited me across the street to his place, for tea. We sat in silence. I didn't feel like talking until someone explained to me what was going on on that block.

No one ever did.

Looking back, in the light of what I know now, but had no notion of back then, I would say: yes, there was a cult. Leonard seemed to be at the head of it. His word held great weight, then and now. But the man who invited me over for tea and chatted normally earlier that day, was not the same man who addressed the meeting later that evening.

These were separate "alters" that might not have known of each other's existence. The alter that addressed the meeting did not recall having phoned me that day, and may not have recalled the two phone calls that came from Hazel – which was when they "switched" –
 

A few years later, when I had all but forgotten this incident, Leonard phoned me again from next door. This time, he told me, he was in very bad shape. "I can't get from one second to the next," he said. "Can you come over? You're the only one who understands me."

Worried, I rang his doorbell and he let me in. He asked me to go shopping for him, to buy food because he didn't feel able to leave his house. "I'm on this new anti-depressant, but it's not working. I'm in an incredible state of anxiety."

Remembering that other day, five years earlier, I said "You must be doing something wrong. You need to be in some kind of therapy to figure it out."

That suggestion just seemed to alarm him. "The doctors at the Allan are doing everything they can for me. Drugs are the only solution."

That was in about 1990. It was one of the last times I saw Leonard in person. Every so often, I'd read an interview with him, but over the next 20 years it seemed he just kept giving the same interview over and over.

We live in an age of totalitarian Mind Control, and entertainers like Leonard are front-line soldiers – as well as victims. We listen to them at our own risk.

NOTE: This article is originally published at this website - where there are additional pictures, some video clips from Youtube and various noteworthy comments from readers:
http://www.abeldanger.net/2014/04/leonard-cohen-and-mkultra-military-mind.html

NOTE: Henry Makow has also published a shortened version at this website:
http://henrymakow.com/2014/09/Leonard%20Cohen-Product-of-Illuminati-Mind-Control.html

Introducing Sibername

The UsuryFree Eye Opener is pleased to establish a working relationship with Sibername - a well-established and locally-owned business in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

SiberName is an Ottawa-based, fully Canadian website services provider. Sibername offers a wide range of web services including domain registration, website hosting and to help you get started a website builder.

Sibername can register your domain name, help you design and maintain your website, and provide first class website hosting in Canada.

Sibername is your one-stop-shop for all your website needs -you only need to manage one relationship. Click on the banner below and you'll learn lots that you didn't know you didn't know AND when you purchase your product/service, The UsuryFree Eye Opener earns a small commission.

Many thanks to Sibername for becoming the first advertising partner with The UsuryFree Eye Opener.

Real Freedom vs Fake Freedom

Real freedom vs. fake freedom. Truth as evidenced in the operations of nature vs. mental constructs antithetical to that holy principle. The hierarchy of man has been inverted since the beginning of rulership by Kings and today this upside down, backwards creation persists in the form of ANY government outside the self. Collectivism vs. Individual dominion - an understanding of philosophy is necessary to understand this complex distortion.

REAL FREEDOM and the NEW WORLD ORDER

There exists two Freedoms. Real freedom and Fake freedom. Real freedom corresponds to responsibility, taking responsibility, being responsible, and acting responsibly.

From this Real freedom stems autonomy, self-governance, determination, and conscious decision making in accord with causing no harm. Being responsible entails being responsible for the propagation of the best interest of oneself as well as the defense of oneself from harm; making choices that are not antithetical toward the self and having the capability to discern the difference between truth and falsehood and be capable to deal with falsehoods being propagated as reality in a stress-free manner – this involves self-mastery and discipline as well as courage. Not only does this benefit the self but it overtly benefits those in society because confidence radiates encouragement in a system based on original truth.

While on the other hand, is the Fake freedom which is the prevalent “freedom” touted in America today. Two hundred plus years ago, the inhabitants of what is today called TheCanada, a great lot of them, knew real freedom and the example I draw from is

“The Articles of Confederation”, the Declaration of Independence, the orations of Patrick Henry, and the writings of Thomas Paine from his pamphlet entitled “Common Sense”. These are Men, and many others from that generation, who were staunch individualists in tune with both physical and non-physical reality, mind and matter.

FAKE FREEDOM and the OLD WORLD ORDER

Fake freedom is the freedom to consume anything, regardless of how unhealthy it is for the person, or how much grief it causes to the conscious thoughts of the person consuming that garbage.

Fake freedom is the “freedom” to be lazy; to do the least amount of thinking possible and rely on so called “experts” to figure all things out. Fake freedom is the “freedom” to be an unfulfilled human who prefers to sit back and watch others live.

He spends endless hours in undiscriminating television viewing. Fake freedom is using violence and coercion to propagate something called "freedom".

I have news for the advocates of this false freedom notion. It's called look at the damage you have done to the spirit of your fellow men and women.

Are you "happy" yet? Or should I ask if you are fake happy or real happy and do you discern the difference?

Real freedom is having the free-will ability to choose something without fear.

Fake freedom is being coerced into pre-designated options under duress. Real freedom is being truly educated; given the tools to learn how to learn for oneself, on ones own, confidently while fake assed freedom is being told what is true and going along with it; being told a declarative sentence and accepting it without question.

My issue with fake assed freedom is that it is not truth and leads to destruction. It is a master deception.

A lie. The lie is that if you surrender, or sacrifice, some of your liberty, someone else will take on your responsibility to decide what is best for you and society as a group. An obvious example of this is legislators. At all times, legislators will to remove “individual” freedom for the best interest of “the group”. In the process, individuals ALWAYS suffer by way of coercion, threats of violence, and duress.

Though, it “sounds” like a noble thing to do, sacrifice a little liberty so that “the group” may prosper, it is an unsound idea simply because “the group” does not exist.

The group ONLY exists within the mind as a construct. And, within this construct of “the group” exists what IS actually true, real, and existent… the individual. There is no group. You may belong to a group of people who work on the same project, but there is no “group benefit”, each is paid according to their “individual” talent and ambition. What “the group” seeks to do is CONFORM all minds into one standardized musical note humming the same tune. This is called collectivism and it is conformity to a low standard.

COLLECTIVISM

Collectivism is the age old idea that “some” are meant to rule while others are meant to be ruled. Leonard Piekoff illustrated this point beautifully in his book The Objectivist, “The philosophy of collectivism upholds the existence of a mystic (and unperceivable) social organism, while denying the reality of perceived individuals—a view which implies that man’s senses are not a valid instrument for perceiving reality.

Collectivism maintains that an elite endowed with special mystic insight should rule men—which implies the existence of an elite source of knowledge, a fund of revelations inaccessible to logic and transcending the mind.

Collectivism denies that men should deal with one another by voluntary means, settling their disputes by a process of rational persuasion; it declares that men should live under the reign of physical force (as wielded by the dictator of the omnipotent state)—a position which jettisons reason as the guide and arbiter of human relationships.

From every aspect, the theory of collectivism points to the same conclusion: collectivism and the advocacy of reason are philosophically antithetical; it is one or the other.”

I would only disagree with his calling collectivism a philosophy because collectivism is actually the absence of philosophy, the destruction of sound reason, which in turn flows toward foolishness, not wisdom.

And yes, that IS a declarative statement… but it’s true. And at this point I would en-courage you to please involve yourself in the study of that truth and come to your own understanding and promote that understanding far and wide to assist others in the inquiry necessary in gaining accuracy of navigation throughout our shared reality.

“NEW” “WORLD” “ORDER”

This idea of a “new world order” of globalism is a two-fold extremity.

The word “new” implies that it is something that has not occurred in the past, a revolutionary idea that will change the paradigm or status quo, and something that has not yet been tested in physical reality.

But on the contrary, what we refer to as new world order is a sugar-coated delusion to insist that something is “new” when it has only been re-packaged, re-formulated, re-animated from “old” ideas that HAVE existed and do still persist.

The collectivism of the group is merely the Feudalism of history.

Feudalism has been re-engineered, re-designed, and re-packaged toward an audience of “consumers”/ "employees"/ "human resources" who do not possess the adequate context of history (the route in which we've arrived to the point in time in which we are now present – the present moment) – And how are we to navigate forward, into the future, with accuracy, and arrive at a suitable destination, if we do not have an accurate understanding of the map from whence we began sail?

To know where we are heading, as a “collective group”, on the sea of life, we must have a map of the terrain. Point A is the past, Point B is the present, and point C is the destination. If we are presently experiencing tumultuous storms, hurricanes, and whirlwinds we must know how we have arrived at this point. Because, it is obvious that the captain of the ship (you) were not paying attention. You were hoodwinked and your attention was placed elsewhere through careful manipulation.

The globalists are correct in their rhetoric depicting the necessity of a "new world order" to usher in an age of peace.

Everyone wants peace unless you're a psychopathic, selfish, little ego driven narcissist, the want is in alignment with empathy and compassion. But the context in which the idea of the new world order will become manifested is the point that must be distinguished between.

The global elitists have an undying thirst for wealth and power, and through the illusion of prestige, the end shall justify the means in achieving their life long aspirations.

Therefore the context in which this supposed "age of peace" is broadcast-ed in is a positive one. However, under careful examination of the motives and deeds they use to catapult the world into this so called "new order", we find Orwellian double-think to be one of the most absolute truths ever to be understood.

REAL NEW WORLD ORDER VS. FAKE NEW WORLD ORDER

It is critical to understand that the “new” world order was the founding of the United States of America. Never before in history was “individual” liberty fought for and actually established. With individual liberty stems the gracious fellowship with nature that enables mankind to expand consciousness toward greater and greater heights of possibility. The founders and framers of this “new” revolutionary idea drew from nature the common sense of it's principles and applied it toward mankind. The government, for the people and BY THE PEOPLE recognized the principle in nature that each individual is sovereign and RESPONSIBLE for their dominion. And with this responsibility there is only two roads to go down – down the road of truth or down the road of error. To preserve Life, liberty, and property or to degrade life, make liberty conditional, and tax privately owned property.

At this point, it is important to recognize that when this nation was founded there were still being perpetuated ideologies, structures, and frames of thinking that led to error. All the governments of history and existing governments, at that time, were ALL based on fallacious, erroneous models – meaning they were not consistent with nature and her rules. The people themselves, which consisted of this “new world” had to adjust to becoming free. So, we can contend that the people, at the dawn of this new revolutionary idea were now making a transition from one state into the other. From being ruled into being masters – determining their own individual course. It was the ultimate Hegelian dialectic where the thinking habits of the people were not squarely in alignment with self-government, in fact a great majority actually insisted upon George Washington being their new King. This intermingling of falsehood and truth has, over the past 250 years resulted in falsehood clearly being the victor of the two because as it is said, you must pluck the weeds otherwise they will take for themselves all of the nourishment from the flowers and overcome them completely. Well, that is firmly the case.

WHY WE ARE EQUAL

All Men are created equal – meaning we are all equally responsible for our thoughts and deeds. The laws of the Universe are equally distributed among ALL men and we will all equally atone for our mistakes. This is evident upon our creations. We create something, like government, we breathe life into it, and magically believe that the consequences of the actions government takes will be distributed solely upon government. ERR WRONG. Any individual, giving away their consent to be governed by it's creation (government) will be subjected to the misery of it's erroneous fruits. The same is true for sculptors who create statues of Gods who the people idolize as God himself; the sculptor reaps what he sows by way of those around him consenting to error. If you think we escape the effects, you are wrong. Yes, we created this tree and we called it government. That tree is producing fruit that the creators all partake and eat from and as a result of the law of cause and effect, the ill situation we call "freedom" is manifested in our life as decay. True freedom is not a creation of the mind of man, rather it is derived from nature NOT government. We all have this natural law of consequences governing our behaviors equally. This is an established, known, and understood principle of nature and is absolutely crucial/ vital to grasp and understand in order to comprehend the foundation upon which individual liberty, rights, and dominion spring.

NOTE: This article is re-posted from this group at Facebook - (not sure who the original author is): https://www.facebook.com/travelordrive

The UsuryFree Eye Opener Celebrates 5,000,000 Visitors

Just reached the magic number of 5 million visitors to my blog - The UsuryFree Eye Opener during the day on Friday, September, 5, 2014 - just 5 weeks after we reached the goal of 4,000,000 visitors.

Though I opened The UsuryFree Eye Opener in 2005, I did not make many postings until 2009. So to reach the first one million readers it took about 5 years. The amazing statistic is that the milestone of 3,000,000 visitors took less than two months after I had reached 2,000,000 visitors - and I have not used any SEO tools - all readers are by way of referral.

I do not know who was the visitor who was number 5,000, 000 BUT many thanks to the new readers and the regular readers at The UsuryFree Eye Opener. You inspire me to keep researching and sharing information that the mainstream media dismisses as "not newsworthy" and that "formal education neglects to teach."

Readers come from all over the world. This chart shows the readers for the past week. Countries with less than 500 visitors are not shown on the chart.

United States          60831
France                     32050
Germany                 6386
United Kingdom     5506
Netherlands            2698
Ukraine                   2143

Russia                       885
Poland                       849
Indonesia                  730
China                         534

Readers are reminded that there is a twin blog titled "The SDI (Self Directed Income) Eye Opener" that focuses on (a) health and wellness issues and topics and (b) the SDI (Self Directed Income) industry - otherwise referred to as network marketing, multi-level marketing, referral marketing or consumer-direct marketing.

And readers are invited to "Like" "The UsuryFree Network" at Facebook and "Join" the group - UsuryFree Creatives at Facebook and likewise readers are invited to "Follow" Tom J Kennedy (Tommy UsuryFree Kennedy) at Facebook.

NOTE: Way back on January 22, 2013, I was excited that for the very first time, The UsuryFree Eye Opener had recorded 1000+ visitors for a single day and I wrote about that milestone in this article: The UsuryFree Eye Opener.

On January 11, 2014 when The UsuryFree Eye Opener achieved the milestone of one million visitors I posted this article titled: The UsuryFree Eye Opener Celebrates 1,000,000 Visitors

On April 26, 2014 when The UsuryFree Eye Opener achieved the milestone of two million visitors I posted this article titled: The UsuryFree Eye Opener Celebrates 2,000,000 Visitors

On June 24, 2014 when the UsuryFree Eye Opener achieved the milestone of three million visitors I posted this article titled: The UsuryFree Eye Opener Celebrates 3,000,000 Visitors.

On August 1, 2014, when the UsuryFree Eye Opener achieved the milestone of four million visitors I posted this article titled: The UsuryFree Eye Opener Celebrates 4,000,000 Visitors.

On September 5, 2014, 5 weeks after achieving the milestone of 4,000,000 visitors we now

have reached the milestone of 5,000,000 visitors with 903,073 visitors in the month of August 2014 - the highest number of visitors ever.

Just by the increasing number of visitors from all over the world who are visiting my blog there is evidence of "awakening" and "consciousness raising." The chart below shows a summary of the daily number of visitors for the past month - ranging from 39,370 on August 7th to a low day on August 27th of 8,615. Most days registered visitors well beyond the number of 20,000. Each day the count starts at 8:00 PM (EST).

BTW - of the 874 posted articles at The UsuryFree Eye Opener - the two most popular article are:

1.  Life Without Usury - 30,816  readers

2. The Usury Battle - 26,572 readers

Usury, Funds, And Banks: Or Lending At Interest

"Usury, Funds, And Banks: Or Lending At Interest" is a book that should be read by every man, especially every young man in the kingdom. I have gained more information from it than from any book big or little I ever read..." William Cobbett, author, "The Protestant Reformation in Ireland and England" 

This jewel of a book is about the tribulations of a humble 19th century Irish priest, and his comprehensive research on the topic of Usury, in pagan antiquity, Judaic law, and in Catholic decrees and canons. 

The book begins with the priest's personal narrative; how he is stripped of his ministry for challenging the local Bishop over the practice of usury in his diocese in Cork, Ireland. Without "a dog to lick his trousers", he somehow (in a series of small miracles) makes it to France, then the USA and Canada, and finally the Vatican, to verify his understanding of Catholic teachings, and ultimately has it confirmed to him in writing by the Holy See in Rome. 

The beauty of Father O' Callaghan's book is that it can be read as a story of a man who gave up what little he had to defend the truth; or as a proof of the destructive effects of usury upon France, England and Ireland, or as a primary reference for all authoritative and ecclesiastical writings on the practice of usury, under whatever name. 

Editor's note: the last few chapters, which covered subjects such as "pew rents" and "grave taxes" have been left out, since they seemed to be both tangential to the topic of usury, and irrelevant to our present culture.

NOTE: Do a search for this kindle edition of "Usury, Funds, And Banks: Or Lending At Interest" at http://www.amazon.com 

Jean-Serge Brisson - Tea Party of One - Tours Western Canada

Front Cover

On June 28, 2014, Jean-Serge Brisson celebrated his 60th birthday with the launch of his new book titled: Tea Party of One - All Governments Invited. Now he is getting ready for his book-tour to Western Canada in September 2014.

Jean Serge Brisson-60th Birthday-Jean Serge Brisson-Tea Party of One

Who Is Jean-Serge Brisson?

1. From Jean-Serge Brisson's website:

"Jean-Serge Brisson was born in 1954 in Embrun, Ontario. He was raised on a dairy farm, attended high school and ultimately opened his own radiator repair business in 1974 in the same small Ontario town. He first became involved in politics in 1980, enticed by the compulsory metrification issue, joined the Libertarian Party in 1986 and ran for the party in the 1988 federal election. He was elected to the boards of both federal and provincial libertarian parties in the early 90’s and has remained active on both boards ever since.

In October 1990, Jean-Serge initiated a “Tax Collection Protest” levied against the Provincial Sales Tax of Ontario, as well as the GST with the federal government. The accusation levied against both levels of government was that “slavery” was being used against private business in the collection of these taxes for governments. To this day, there has been no action to contest this accusation in court, and Jean-Serge's business, "Independent Radiator", has legally "not" collected any taxes since October 1991.

Jean-Serge first became leader of the Libertarian Party of Canada during the 2000 party convention and was re-elected as leader in 2005. Prior to becoming leader, he ran as a candidate in the 1988 and 1993 federal elections, and in 1990 and 1995 in the Ontario provincial elections. He did not run in the 2004 federal election feeling that having just been elected a councilor, it would not have been right to run for another seat at a different level of government even though there was little chance of getting elected. He took his position as councilor seriously and wanted to concentrate on his new position.

He did not run in the 2005 federal election either because of his protest to the Adscam scandal that the Liberals were involved with and he challenged the validity of the election. In doing so, he could not validate his running in an election he did not feel was valid. He remained the National Leader till the convention of May 2008 which was held in Edmonton and did not run for re-election as Leader feeling that the time was appropriate for someone else to take the reins of the party. (snip) ...

Back Cover

2. From the Forward (pages ix and x) of the book “Tea Party of One” Dave Brown, Ottawa columnist (1965-2003) - now retired - writes: 

NOTE: This Forward is also posted at Jean-Serge Brisson's website:

"What would happen if you held a revolution and nobody showed up? It’s a gag question that has been hanging around for generations, and Jean-Serge Brisson is the only man I’ve met who is in a position to answer it.

Our first meeting happened in 1991 when he appeared in my office at the Ottawa Citizen. He was thirty-seven, president of the Libertarian Party of Canada, who punctuated much of what he said with a hearty laugh-and what he said included delightful one-liners.

I was a daily columnist mining material in the dark forest-that area where reporters seldom go. The forest has no roads, few trails, zero signposts, and it takes up most of the time and space we live in. It’s heavily populated by average people, and many of them are strange critters. For the most part they’re powerless, so of little interest to the news-chasers who focus on power and high profiles.

Here was a middle-aged operator of a struggling radiator repair shop in Embrun, a satellite community about thirty kilometres east of Parliament Hill, who likened humans to lemmings, but at the same time was proud to be one of them. His only difference, he claimed, was that he stopped to ask: “Where are we going?”

“There’s a precipice out there, someplace,” he said, and he knew it because when lawmakers make laws, governments get more power. When that happens, we forest creatures lose freedom. The balance point is the cliff.

Mr. Brisson wanted to use column space to announce the start of his revolution against “slavery” in present day Canada. He tied it to the GST (goods and service tax), saying that he, as a businessman, had been ordered to start collecting it. He figured he was being ordered to work without pay. That’s slavery. He figured the extra work would take four hours a week, and wanted to be paid at the going rate of a tax collector.

The bureaucratic answer boiled down to this: Everybody else is doing it. Get back in the pack, and keep your head down.

Lemming Brisson broke ranks.

Over the next twenty-three years-and as many columns-I was the one-man press corps covering this one-man war. Both the rebel and the reporter kept it light. Brisson started as an irritant, but wouldn’t bend, instead finding new ways to harass The Man. He earned a verbal promotion, from thorn-in-the-side to full fledged haemorrhoid. Just when his opponents started to get comfortable, he would flare up again.

He tossed around lines like: “Giving money and power to government is like giving whisky and car keys to teenage boys.” Here’s how he once described his duties as vice-president of the Libertarian Party of Canada: “To step in when the president gets assassinated.” His resistance to lemming behaviour earned him trips to jail for attitude adjustment. Instead, he appointed himself the prison system’s food critic.

His revolution got him enough attention to send him on cross-country speaking tours. He could hold audiences and make them laugh at the bureaucratic stupidity that surrounds us, and the way we so easily fall into step. We’re Canadians, eh. He also earned enough credibility to get elected to municipal council.

One of the details that made it possible for him to launch his one-man war was that he has never married. If he had family responsibilities, his quixotic lifestyle wouldn’t have been supportable.

By giving Brisson so much ink over the years, critics have condemned me as frivolous. My response is that anybody willing to stand up for his principles, to the point this man has, is a story-with-legs. He’s worth running with.

Readers of this book can form their own opinions, and it’s a safe bet that in the reading they’ll find more than a few laughs, and some personal attitude adjustment. I know I have." (snip) 

Dave Brown, Ottawa columnist, 1965-2003

Retired

Ottawa, 2014

Jean-Serge signed my book :)

3. Tea Party of One - All Governments Invited: A Book Review By Shirley Dolan

4.  We Are Change Victoria and CLEAR are co-sponsoring various events for Jean-Serge Brisson's Western Canada Tour. (see links below for complete details)

(a) Jean-Serge Brisson’s Tea Party Of One Tours Western Canada

(b) CLEAR Co-hosts Jean-Serge Brisson’s Western Canada Tour

5. Before Jean-Serge Brisson Departs For Western Canada He Speaks at the Annual AGM for the Carleton Landowner’s Association

NOTE: Jean-Serge Brisson's website: http://www.jeansergebrisson.net